jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012


ERROR CORRECTION


Hi buddies!, As we know, sometimes it’s difficult to find a way to correct our students because we are in a risk that if we correct them in away they don’t like or in some way we make them feel embarrassed or something like that, they won’t want to talk or write again because they will be afraid of committing mistakes in class at the moment of speaking or writing. Or also as many of us have noticed in ICPNA classes we find many kind of  people teenagers , adults ,people in their forties , people who don’t like being corrected and so on!. What to do in these cases? Here I have found three techniques.



1. Teacher Modeling & Correction of Spoken Errors  When the teacher corrects a speaking error, what he or she is actually doing is providing a correct model for the learner to emulate. This stage, applied at any level, and especially at low levels, ensures that the learners receive correct information.
The best technique that a teacher can use is to correctly repeat back to the learner what they had said incorrectly, and then have them repeat it again. Never echo the error that the learner has made, as this can sound like you are mocking them.
Whatever you do, you must make this process gentle and positive to ensure that the learner is receptive. Your goal is to ensure the learners are developing awareness of the error, rather than making it a matter of “right and wrong.” Avoid negative language at all costs. Avoid saying, “No,” or “Wrong,” or anything similar. In fact, praise the effort made, even if incorrect. Follow up by modeling the correction, and praise the learner again when he or she reproduces the language correctly.





2. Learner Comparison & Correcting Written Errors  In classrooms where the learners have developed a good working rapport with each other, (an important requirement for this technique!) the teacher can step out of the center by allowing the learners to develop error awareness amongst themselves.
It is important however, that the learners are encouraged to compare errors, rather than actually employ a correction technique. The latter approach could result in management problems for you. For example, a younger learner should not correct an older learner in some cultures. In others, a woman may not correct a man. In multi-lingual classrooms, there could be resentment of one national correcting a non-allied national (ex: Japanese to Russian, or French to German). Beyond the cultural conflicts, there could also be resentment arising from personality conflicts.
To get around these problems, an effective strategy is to leave spoken error correction to the teacher. For the correction of written tasks, however, invite learners to compare their answers. Avoid employing a teacher-to-learner correction of a task, which can be isolating, exposing and time consuming in most circumstances.
As they do this, make sure you monitor and make yourself available to clear up any further confusion, and also to correct any misinformation. In this way, it is unnecessary to correct the task with the whole class, and you can move more seamlessly on to the next task.



3. Self-Correction  When a learner can correct him or herself, you know that the learner has arrived at the most desirable level of error awareness: self-correction. There is nothing more satisfying than to hear your learners self-correct errors that, at one time, were frustratingly common every time they opened their mouths or put pen to paper. Getting to this stage, however, may take a while; especially for certain deeply-ingrained errors such as article omission, tense confusion, or word choice.
Be patient and gentle. Allow learners to finish talking. Don’t jump on the error. As soon as the learner has completed talking, draw their attention to the problem by asking them to repeat some part of what they said. If they repeat the error, gently indicate that there is a problem. If they are unable to self-correct, simply model correctly and have them repeat it.










REFLECTION!
I strongly believe finding the  correct way to correct our  students is really important if we  want to have a good  environment  and a good relationship with our students , also to  be really careful with students when we  correct them because if  we make our  students feel embarrassed or make a  world of their mistake they will not want to talk again , write , read and they will get discouraged , even they could not get back to your class anymore.

4 comentarios:

  1. I agree with you Karen. We should be careful when we are going to correct a student's mistake because we never if he or she will feel bad about it. On the other hand, personally speaking, I prefer the self-correction so that the student will notice his/her own mistake and will always remember it. Nice job!

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Hi Karen,

    I think that correcting students errors is necessary in order to help them to improve their pronunciation,grammar skills but sometimes, students will feel criticized so it is very important that teachers have to find a good technique to correct their errors.
    In my opinion,I like the first technique because teachers listen what the students said and then, teachers help them to notice the errors.

    Great job :) !

    ResponderEliminar
  3. hey! karen

    A teacher should be aware that if he or she does not correct students ,they could have bigger problems in the future,with the same mistakes all the time.

    grettings!

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Hi karen
    Your post is interesting, There are many error correction techniques. Which is the best no one knows with certainty. It depends student' error.

    ResponderEliminar